Shtakser reviewed American girls in red Russia by Julia L. Mickenberg
Review of 'American girls in red Russia' on 'Goodreads'
5 stars
This is a very good book on generation of US feminists who, at least for a while, perceived Soviet Union as a cultural alternative to the oppressed status of women in their own country. These women traveled to Soviet Union, worked for its people as charity workers, journalists, artists, or political activists, and went back in order to present an alternative of equality between the genders as well as, especially for these who were not white, intolerance towards any kind of racism. The author defends them from later accusations of betraying their country and cynically lying about the repression within Soviet Union. She claims, reasonably, that for them Soviet Union was an imaginary alternative and that their main concerns were in fact within the US. Sadly Soviet Union eventually proved to be too oppressive to defend even for these who wished to idealize it. Even more sadly, the former idealization …
This is a very good book on generation of US feminists who, at least for a while, perceived Soviet Union as a cultural alternative to the oppressed status of women in their own country. These women traveled to Soviet Union, worked for its people as charity workers, journalists, artists, or political activists, and went back in order to present an alternative of equality between the genders as well as, especially for these who were not white, intolerance towards any kind of racism. The author defends them from later accusations of betraying their country and cynically lying about the repression within Soviet Union. She claims, reasonably, that for them Soviet Union was an imaginary alternative and that their main concerns were in fact within the US. Sadly Soviet Union eventually proved to be too oppressive to defend even for these who wished to idealize it. Even more sadly, the former idealization of the country and connection between its policies and civil rights' struggles offered a basis for the 1950s conservatives to attack the civil rights activists as dishonest and disloyal. Still, the author claims that the existence of a Soviet alternative, even a somewhat imaginary one, created a tangible basis for feminist activism which affected a whole generation of young US women during the 1920s and 1930s, a generation which went on supporting later generations of feminists.
Indeed, there is something about these women's intentional blindness while in Soviet Union, as well as about the racism some of them managed to combine with alleged political radicalism which I found deeply annoying. Still, a history of radicalism of any kind involves people whose radicalism is limited. They are still an important part of the story.