User Profile

Aidan Reads

aidanreads767@bookwyrm.social

Joined 7 months, 2 weeks ago

I am an autodidact always looking for new things to learn. I teach high school literature. My main bookish interests are theology, philosophy, poetry, and science fiction/fantasy

This link opens in a pop-up window

2024 Reading Goal

2% complete! Aidan Reads has read 1 of 50 books.

Review of 'The art of living' on 'Goodreads'

4 stars

Overall helpful. Alice von Hildebrand's two essays were phenomenal and worth the price of the book. I will be seeking out her work elsewhere. Dietrich was much more analytical, dry, and in my view arbitrary, descending almost to the level of a Sunday School scolding. But there were moments where he shined as well, correcting abuses and tempering with love which is normally found in Catholic ethics.

reviewed The river between by Ngũgĩ wa Thiongʾo (African writers series -- 17)

Ngũgĩ wa Thiongʾo, Ngũgĩ wa Thiongʼo: The river between (1965, Heinemann) 4 stars

Review of 'The river between' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

3.5, I did like the book and I learned a lot from it but you can tell its the author's first novel. The first half of the novel is a classic coming-of-age tale with a practical realism meeting the magical memory of the Kenyan hilllands. It plays out important issues for Africans under colonialism, dealing very directly with the complex issue of female circumcision. But the second half of the book is too burdened by repetitive exposition, and morality play style allusions for it to really shine, although certainly, the potential is there. The book is worth reading and I look forward to reading other of Thiong'o's works.

Jon Krakauer: Into the wild (1997, Anchor Books) 4 stars

In April 1992 a young man from a well-to-do family hitchhiked to Alaska and walked …

Review of 'Into the wild' on 'Goodreads'

3 stars

Read this book with my ninth-grade literature class. My students were initially intrigued, often times baffled by the character of Chris McCandless and his story. Jon Krakauer goes into painstaking detail, and the book catalogs the effort to find that painstaking detail. But this is largely where to book goes wrong. It doesn't feel cohesive and it often lost us as readers. McCandless' story can be inspiring but bogged down by pages of minuscule detail, loose conjecture, and stories of different adventurers that don't relate to McCandless' own, the power of witnessing McCandless' short but passionate life is all but snuffed out. You can tell that the book is not Krakauer's preferred form. As one of my students said, "this is why no one reads magazines anymore."