Aaron Lord started reading Exvangelicals by Sarah McCammon
Exvangelicals by Sarah McCammon
INSTANT NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER NATIONAL BESTSELLER
"An intimate window into the world of American evangelicalism. Fellow exvangelicals will find …
software dev in northern california • former worship leader now exvangelical, though the bulk of my reading history is theology • fiddle player 🎻 • INTJ • he/him
This link opens in a pop-up window
25% complete! Aaron Lord has read 3 of 12 books.
INSTANT NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER NATIONAL BESTSELLER
"An intimate window into the world of American evangelicalism. Fellow exvangelicals will find …
“When a religion is adopted in later years the impulse for it is almost wholly emotional rather than rational; proselytising of teenagers and adults typically targets loneliness, confusion, failure, grief, anxiety and depression as opportunities for conversion. The psychological support given by the fellowship thus offered is attributed by the convert to his newly formed relationship with that religion’s deity–or so the sceptical observer of this phenomenon would say.”
— The God Argument: The Case Against Religion and for Humanism by A. C. Grayling
The fact that anyone can say, "I believe in the teachings of Jesus Christ and that's why I'm voting for Donald Trump" without bursting into flame is the final proof that God plays no role in the affairs of men.
https://apnews.com/article/trump-god-bless-usa-bible-greenwood-2713fda3efdfa297d0f024efb1ca3003
It gets a bit too touchy-feely in the second half. I should have expected it since the author is a humanist "chaplain". He wants humanists to do the things religious people do—meet on Sundays, have buildings, do weddings and funerals—basically turning humanism into something that is not secular at all, but just another faith in a pluralistic inter-faith society. Might as well just go full-bore Unitarian. Frankly, I'd rather spend my Sundays watching football or mowing the lawn... And if I wanted to give away my money I'd help other poor people instead of contributing to YABF (yet another building fund).
INSTANT NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER NATIONAL BESTSELLER
"An intimate window into the world of American evangelicalism. Fellow exvangelicals will find …
The award-winning journalist and staff writer for The Atlantic follows up his New York Times bestseller American Carnage with this …
A great book. I am an exvangelical. Alberta has admitted he has not “deconstructed “, though he writes, “Biblical Christianity requires a constant reassessing of one’s beliefs and biases; deconstruction is something that should be done every single day.” Even though I left the church a decade ago, I still hold so much of church culture in myself. So I was able to understand where Alberta was coming from. This book is a great takedown of Trumpism and right-wing evangelicalism, if you can get past the author’s pro-life stance.
I just wish it had a different cover. Alberta’s intended audience is the Church. But there’s no way I could send a copy of this book to my dad, who really needs to read it. He’d throw it away on sight.
"When Trump mentioned Pence and the evangelical audience booed their brother in Christ, I said to myself, this is the final compromise," Thomas told me. "Here is your brother. Here is a man who worships the Lord that you claim to worship. Here is a man who goes to church every Sunday. Here is a man who has had only one wife and never been accused of being unfaithful. And you're booing him? As opposed to a serial adulterer? A man who uses the worst language you can think of and does every other thing you oppose? Explain that to me from a biblical perspective. Please."
— Tim Alberta The Kingdom, the Power, and the Glory: American Evangelicals in an Age of Extremism by Tim Alberta (Page 203)
The award-winning journalist and staff writer for The Atlantic follows up his New York Times bestseller American Carnage with this …
Greed is not good. Massive income and wealth inequality is not good. Buying elections is not good. Profiting from human illness is not good. Charging people the highest prices in the world for prescription drugs is not good. Exploiting workers is not good. Monopolization of the economy by a handful of corporations is not good. Ignoring the needs of the most vulnerable among us-children, the elderly, and people with disabilities—is not good. Racism, sexism, homophobia, and xenophobia are not good. For-profit prisons that make money by locking up poor people are not good. Wars and excessive military budgets are not good. Carbon emissions that destroy our planet are not good.
— It's OK to Be Angry about Capitalism by Bernie Sanders, Nichols, John (Page 99)
@DrFerrous@hachyderm.io Calling it "evolution" was apt for me while I progressed away from young-earth creationism to old-earth evolutionary creationism and conservative politics to left-wing, all while remaining a Christian. But once I left it behind, the actual "tearing down" of the evangelical ways of thinking I was brought up with has required this "deconstruction." Even after 10 years of being an atheist I still have to catch myself sometimes to avoid old thought patterns.
Gushee correctly points out the errors in Christian Nationalism, but avoids the term because he dislikes it. He describes it as "authoritarian reactionary Christianity," which I dislike because "reactionary" seems to put them on the defensive justifiably, whereas in my opinion, Christian nationalists haven't been wronged and have nothing to defend themselves for.
His solution to the growing problem is a covenental approach towards society (as in Covenant Theology, see Puritans, Reformed Baptists), nurtured by participation in a Baptist polity. That is, as people are brought up in the church to participate in a local congregational church government, they are in training for a democratic participation/covenant in the broader community. But the covenental approach is decidedly religious in nature and fails to take the atheist into account, other than acknowledging separation of church and state and that "all are equal." It doesn't offer Enlightenment solutions because the covenant itself is …
Gushee correctly points out the errors in Christian Nationalism, but avoids the term because he dislikes it. He describes it as "authoritarian reactionary Christianity," which I dislike because "reactionary" seems to put them on the defensive justifiably, whereas in my opinion, Christian nationalists haven't been wronged and have nothing to defend themselves for.
His solution to the growing problem is a covenental approach towards society (as in Covenant Theology, see Puritans, Reformed Baptists), nurtured by participation in a Baptist polity. That is, as people are brought up in the church to participate in a local congregational church government, they are in training for a democratic participation/covenant in the broader community. But the covenental approach is decidedly religious in nature and fails to take the atheist into account, other than acknowledging separation of church and state and that "all are equal." It doesn't offer Enlightenment solutions because the covenant itself is biblical.